A butterfly for your cock? Survey says No.

As I have mentioned before, we have a small army of folks who are kind enough to test out some of the toys that we are undecided on. Because we are committed to only selling toys that are safe and do what they promise, we make sure that new toys meet certain standards of usability and FUN! This kind couple was game for trying out a vibrating cockring that has a larger than normal forward projection and pointless wings. I was skeptical that it would pass muster and I was right. It did not. Here are some reason why we are skipping the FlutterRing:

The biggest hurdle in using the Flutter Ring was the form. The butterfly shape simply looked ridiculous on my cock. It proved a barrier to even getting started–neither of us could stop laughing.

The “wings” and “tail” didn’t transmit vibrations very well and didn’t do much for us aside from looking silly. I can see the toy perhaps being better enjoyed by a femme-identified person. My guess is most of your male customers won’t be too into it.

I’ve tried toys like this before, and they’ve always been too jab-y. The Flutter Ring wasn’t much better, although the flexibility and softness of the material made it a little easier to thrust with. In the end though, vibrating cock rings really shouldn’t have forward protrusions. Even moderate thrusting quickly becomes uncomfortable and awkward.

I feel as though the design of this toy wasn’t really thought through. It seems like a potentially good idea from the outset, but just doesn’t work like it should.

Jab-y really is a turn off, isn’t it?